Family Guy, Friend or Foe? Essay

Family Guy and Freud Jokes and Their coincidence to the Unconscious In Antonia Peacocke article Family Guy and Freud Jokes and Their comparison to the Unconscious, she discuses the provide created by Seth MacFarlane, stating how she loves the deliver and how she potty nevertheless recite s eeral sequels by heart. However, when she original started breaking the rise she did non care for the display case of humor that was expressed. Peacocke goes onto let offs that she is not the only peerless who has these resembling feelings on how the show is bigoted and crude (Peacocke). yard to this was when the show was potentiometercelled not only once, that also twice, in 2000 and 2002. Soon after the show was band, complaints from so galore(postnominal) viewers to Fox telly Network, the producers were forced to start airing the show everyplace again (Peacocke).However, as she continued to watch the video program, she find that in that location was more than on the un derstructureon racist, discriminatory, and bestiality jokes to be make fulln from the show (Peacocke). She even goes on to landed estate how she gave the show a second chance and recognise that it actually had a purpose and confronted the stereotypes homoy mickle use today. Family Guy is one of the to the highest degree disgusting, evil and racist shows I deal ever laid my eyes on, that is what I first thought process after watching the TV show, Family Guy, for the first while, directly that I look foul on it, it is solely not confessedly. If you look into the show more late and pose what Seth McFarland, creator of Family Guy, is move to portray you realize in that location is a lot more to it. I took the same view of the show as Peacocke, at first I did not interchange equal to(p) it, barely I was forced by my family and fri contrasts to watch it. After watching several successions, I stepped hindquarters and took a deeper look at the racist and prejudiced jokes said on the show, and I realized there was more to learn and see then just getting a chuckle prohibited of the cruel jokes.Family Guy can be one of the or so discriminatory and de import television programs out(p) there but if you burgeon forth a step back and look at what Seth MacFarlane is attempt to get at, from the women of the 1950s to the ostraciseships of the FCC, you can learn the original meaning of Family Guy. Anyone who has ever watched an episode of Family Guy exit meet that the show is very offence and often time sexist, but most people do not really get the true meaning of the show and how it relates to the stereotypes in our day to day lives. In one occasion in Peacocke es hypothesise Family Guy and Freud Jokes and Their apprisal to the Unconscious, she states that in an episode I am hawkshaw, here me Roar, there is a scene of an old 1950s work place where a business man is talking astir(predicate) how women are very unsafe about their appearance( ).He explains that men should be indisputable to complement women on how they look, even if they are ugly, because they will believe it (302). consequently the businessman goes on to say that a firm slap on their butt will let them know what good of a job they have done (302). I take this not to be a sexist skit but how the women of the 1950s were mocked in the work place and how frequent it was for this to happen to them. This is just one of the many examples of people misunderstanding Family Guy. Peacocke also includes in her essay how celebrities exercise the way we mean and what we do things in our commonplace lives. This is shown in one episode of Family Guy, mentioned in Peacockes essay, when Brian and Stewie, are talking about Stewies extract of instructing material (304).Brian then goes on to explain to Stewie that he only picks what he is going to read based on the books presented in Oprahs rule book Club on the Oprah Winfrey show (304). However, Stewie is quick to abjure any of his accusations. Soon after Stewies denial, Brian is able to get Stewie to admit that he really is interpretation the book simply because Oprah suggests it. Here they are trying to demonstrate how Americans are automatic to listen to the suggestions of celebrities and do what they tell us to do, without cogitateing twice about it. I agree with Peacocke on this because I have first hand experiences with my family. One example of this is my protoactinium is a huge Payton Manning fan. When he saw that Payton was endorsing the discoloration Buick, he just had to go run out and get one because he wanted to be just like Payton. When I asked him about it, he said that it was a nice car and had zippo to do with Payton. But in the back of my headway I knew it was because of Payton. This goes to show that people are spontaneous to follow the instructions of celebrities but dont really want to admit that they do (304).An episode of Family Guy, PTV, as mentioned in Peaco ckes essay, the Federal chat Commission (FCC) is trying to shut down Peters Griffins own television show because it is not illegalizeed and appropriate complete to be put on television (306). Then the FCC takes it to a whole other level and tries to censor the town where they live, Quahog, later the FCC puts black bars over nude Griffins and uses a frog horn when they are using a beshrew word. The point MacFarlane is trying to depict in this episode is that no matter how such(prenominal) you try and censor media, you can never change the unforgiving record of humans and therefore, in trying to do so, would be virtually impossible. Peacocke also states in the essay that it is the call forths responsibility to watch over their children and there is more to worry about in this realism then television (306).This reminds me of one of my own ain experiences with this as a child. One of my favorite shows that my papa let me watch growing up, The Three Stooges, got criminalise b ecause the FCC thought that with them beating each other up and getting hurt every episode that it promoted violence, even though it was just a funny show to watch and get a laugh out of. Similarly, in Family Guy, they are not promoting hurtful racial or sexist slurs they are showing the true stereotypes that exist in people today. At the end of the day, I have first hand experiences on both sides of the story.I have a fair understanding of the side, which does not care for Family Guy, and the side that knows the true meaning behind the television program. If the people who think this show is a disgrace would just take a step back, they could that Family Guy really has much more to offer then just racist, sexist and bestiality jokes. There is a distinct difference between what many people believe is sexist and what is simply just what the creator of Family Guy is trying to show us how people stereotype. I think that people are much more willing to listen to a message about differen ce and sexism if it is delivered in a funny way and they can make themselves believe it is really not them.